Weed dynamics, weed control efficiency, crop growth and yield attributes of chickpea in response to chemical weed management

Authors

  • Devrani Gupta Department of Agronomy, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda (U.P.) India
  • Dinesh Sah Department of Agronomy, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda (U.P.) India
  • A. H. Kalhapure Department of Agronomy, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda (U.P.) India
  • Deo Kumar Department of SSAC, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda (U.P.) India
  • G. S. Panwar Department of Agronomy, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda (U.P.) India

Keywords:

Chemical Weed Management, Chickpea, Growth, Weed Dynamics, Yield Attributes,

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Research Farm of the College of Agriculture, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda. The climate of this region is typically semi-arid, characterized by extremes of temperatures during both summers and winters. The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 10 treatment combinations of pre and post-emergence herbicides. Among herbicides pre-emergence application of Imazethapyr 40g alone or in combination with pendimethalin or oxyfluorfen significantly reduced weed density, and weed dry weight and proved efficient in managing sedge weeds. The highest weed control efficiency recorded at all three stages of crop growth was associated with Pendimethalin 1000g PE fb Imazethapyr 40g PoE. Application of Pendimethalin 1000g PE fb Quizalofop-ethyl 50g PoE markedly influenced the yield and yield attributes of chickpea.

References

Anonymous. 2020. Pocket book of Agricultural Statistics 2020. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture Co-operation and Farmers’ Welfare, Ministry

of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Govt. of India, New Delhi 2020.

Chander N, Kumar S, Rana S S and Ramesh. 2014. Weed competition, yield attributes and yield in soybean- wheat cropping system as affected by herbicides. Indian J. Agronomy 59(3): 377-384.

Chaudhary B M, Patel J J and Delvadia D R. 2005. Effect of weed management practices and seed rates on weeds and yield of chickpea. Indian Journal of Weed Sciences 37: 271-272.

Chopra N, Chopra N K, and Singh H P. 2003. Loss in seed yield and quality due to weed stress in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 73(6): 350-351.

Kumar N, Hazra K K, Yadav S L and Singh S S. 2015. Weed dynamics and productivity of chickpea under pre and post emergence application of herbicides. Indian J. Agronomy 60(4): 570-575.

Singh S and Singh A N. 2000. Crop-weed competition in chickpea: Challenges and strategies for the New Millenium. In National Symposium on Agronomy, p 199. Nov 15-18, GAU Campus, Junagadh.

Vivek R, Singh N S and Tomar S S. 2008. Effect of weed interference on weeds and productivity of black gram. Indian J. of Weed Science 40 (1&2): 65-67.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-01

How to Cite

Gupta, D., Sah, D., Kalhapure, A. H., Kumar, D., & Panwar, G. S. (2022). Weed dynamics, weed control efficiency, crop growth and yield attributes of chickpea in response to chemical weed management. The Journal of Rural Advancement, 10(02), 45–48. Retrieved from http://jra.idtra.co.in/index.php/jra/article/view/42