Agronomical performance, chemical composition and nutrient yield of open-pollinated and hybrid fodder varieties of sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.)] at 50 percent flowering stage in Grid region
Open-pollinated and hybrid fodder varieties of sweet sorghum
##semicolon##
Grid Region, Hybrid sorghum, Nutrient Yield, Open-pollinated sorghum, PAC52093, Sorghum Fodder, SPSSH19, SPSSV15, SPSSV20, Sweet Sorghumसार
The present study was an effort to compare the agronomical performance, chemical composition and nutrient yield of fodder open-pollinated and hybrids sweet sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.)] in the Grid region. Two advanced sweet sorghum genotypes of open-pollinated (SPSSV15; SPSSV20), and two hybrids (PAC52093; SPSSH19) were planted at four locations of Grid region viz. two each at Sithouli (26.140°N, 78.196°E; 27.205°N, 77.498°E) and Turari (26.122°N, 78.177°E; 26.138°N, 78.207°E) of Gwalior District during rainy season of 2021. The seeds were sown using the manual dibbling method at a uniform depth of 5 cm during the second week of June in 3 replications. The recommended dose of fertilizers was applied in the form of urea, single super phosphate, and muriate of potash. Data on plant height, biomass accumulation, days to flowering and physiological maturity were recorded using standard procedures. At the 50 per cent flowering stage, ten representative plants from the four central rows of each plot were sampled. The plant biomass was oven-dried, ground and used for chemical estimation. Suitable statistical methods were used to analyze the data. The hybrid genome SPSSH19 proved superior to the rest of the genotypes under study in terms overall fodder performance including the agronomical performance, chemical composition and nutrient yield. There was no significant difference in fodder performance of four genomes at the four locations under the present study. The conclusion based on the study is that hybrid variety SPSSH19 can be recommended as a fodder crop in the Grid region.
##submission.citations##
Adeli A and Varco J J. 2002. Potassium management effects on cotton yield, nutrition and soil potassium level. Journal Plant Nutrition. 25: 2229-2242.
Almodares A and Mostafafi Darany S M. 2006. Effects of planting date and time of nitrogen application on yield and sugar content of sweet sorghum. Journal of Environmental Biology. 27: 601-605.
Almodares A, Taheri R and Adeli S. 2007. Inter-relationship between growth analysis and carbohydrate contents of sweet sorghum cultivars and lines. Journal of Environmental Biology. 28: 527-531.
Anonymous, 2018. Demand and supply projections towards 2033: Crops, livestock, fisheries and agricultural inputs. The Working Group Report (February, 2018). Niti Ayog, New Delhi.
AOAC. 2019. Official Methods of Analysis, 21st Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 21st ed. Washington, DC.
Goering H K and Van Soest P J. 1970. Forage fibre analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedure and some application). Agricultural Handbook No, 379, Agricultural Research Series. United States Department of Agriculture, pp. 1-12.
Sami R A, Yeye M Y, Ishiyaku M F and Usman I S. 2013. Heritabiliy studies in some sweet sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor. L. Moench) genotypes. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. 3: 17, 49-51.
Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods, 8th Ed., Ames, Iowa State University Press.
Sriagtula R, Martaguri I, Sowmen S and Zurmiati. 2021. Evaluation of nutrient solution dose and harvest time on forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) in hydroponic fodder system. International Conference on Animal Production for Food Sustainability, June, 16. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 888: 012068.
Tilly J M and Terry R A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of British Grassland Society.18: 104–111.
U Q Library. 2016. Excel 2016, Data analysis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.
Zemene M, Mekuriaw Y and Asmare B. 2020. Effect of plant spacing and harvesting age on plant characteristics, yield and chemical composition of para grass (Brachiaria mutica) at bahir dar, Ethiopia. Animal Science and Biotechnologies. 53: 137-145.
Zhang L, Leng C, Luo H, Wu X, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Xia Y, Shang L and Liu C. 2018. Sweet Sorghum Originated through Selection of Dry, a Plant-Specific NAC Transcription Factor Gene. The Plant Cell. 30: 2286–2307.
